The Who Fires Zak Starkey: A Shocking Split
Table of Contents
- The Shocking Second Firing of Zak Starkey
- Zak Starkey: A Rock Royal Biography
- A Legacy Forged: Zak Starkey and The Who (1996-2025)
- The Royal Albert Hall Incident: A Catalyst for Change
- The First Dismissal and Swift Reinstatement
- Unraveling the Mayhem: The Second Firing and Underlying Tensions
- Beyond The Who: Zak Starkey's New Chapter
- The Who Moves Forward: With Optimism and Fire
The Shocking Second Firing of Zak Starkey
The news broke on Sunday, May 18, 2025, that The Who had once again parted ways with their drummer, Zak Starkey. This announcement, made via Instagram by both the band and Starkey himself, came as a significant surprise, especially considering he had only recently been reinstated after an initial dismissal in April 2025. Starkey, in his candid exit interview, revealed that he was let go for a second time, following what he described as "weeks of mayhem." This rapid succession of firings and reinstatements paints a picture of internal strife and confusion within the legendary band. For nearly three decades, Zak Starkey was the driving force behind The Who's fierce live shows, providing the powerful, dynamic drumming that fans had come to expect. His departure marks a significant shift for the band, raising questions about their future sound and live performances. The public nature of this split, with details emerging from Starkey's own words, suggests a deeper underlying issue than a simple creative difference.Zak Starkey: A Rock Royal Biography
Zak Starkey was born into rock royalty, a lineage that would inevitably shape his musical path. As the son of The Beatles' legendary drummer Ringo Starr and Maureen Cox, he was immersed in music from an early age. His godfather was none other than Keith Moon, the electrifying and enigmatic drummer of The Who, whose wild style and unparalleled energy defined the band's early years. This unique connection positioned Zak Starkey perfectly to eventually step into Moon's formidable shoes. Born on November 11, 1965, Zak received his first drum kit from his father at the age of eight. While Ringo initially discouraged him from drumming, Zak quickly developed a natural talent and passion for the instrument. He was largely self-taught, drawing inspiration from various drummers, including his father and godfather. His early career saw him play with various bands, honing his skills and developing his own distinct style, which blended power, precision, and a touch of the theatrical flair reminiscent of Moon.Personal Data | Details |
---|---|
Full Name | Zak Richard Starkey |
Date of Birth | November 11, 1965 |
Place of Birth | London, England |
Parents | Ringo Starr (father), Maureen Cox (mother) |
Godfather | Keith Moon |
Main Instrument | Drums |
Notable Bands | The Who, Oasis, Johnny Marr & The Healers, The Icicle Works, Mantra of the Cosmos |
Years Active | 1980s–present |
A Legacy Forged: Zak Starkey and The Who (1996-2025)
Zak Starkey first joined The Who in 1996, stepping into a role that had been vacant in a permanent capacity since Keith Moon's untimely death in 1978. While various drummers had filled in over the years, Starkey's arrival marked a new era of stability for the band's rhythm section. His unique position—not just as Moon's godson but as the son of Beatles drummer Ringo Starr—made him uniquely qualified for the job. He possessed both the technical prowess and the innate understanding of The Who's dynamic, explosive sound. For nearly three decades, Starkey was the unwavering force behind The Who's fierce live shows. He brought a blend of power, precision, and a touch of the unpredictable energy that Moon famously embodied, without attempting to simply imitate him. His drumming became synonymous with The Who's later touring years, providing a solid foundation for Pete Townshend's guitar theatrics and Roger Daltrey's powerful vocals. Fans widely praised his ability to honor Moon's legacy while injecting his own identity into the band's iconic songs. His tenure saw The Who continue to tour extensively, performing their classic hits to new generations of fans worldwide. He was an integral part of their live performances, consistently delivering the high-octane energy required for songs like "My Generation," "Baba O'Riley," and "Won't Get Fooled Again." Starkey's dedication and long service made his recent departure all the more shocking, as he had become an indispensable part of The Who's live identity. The band, including Roger Daltrey, 81, and Pete Townshend, 79, had come to rely heavily on his consistent performance.The Royal Albert Hall Incident: A Catalyst for Change
The seeds of Zak Starkey's recent departure from The Who appear to have been sown during a live performance in March at London's Royal Albert Hall. This particular concert, part of a run of four Teenage Cancer Trust benefit gigs, became the focal point of a dispute that ultimately led to his firing."The Song Is Over" Controversy
According to Starkey, the issue started when the band chose to play "The Song Is Over" from their seminal *Who's Next* album. This particular track, a complex and nuanced piece, was not a regular feature in their live set. Starkey himself suggested adding the song as a special moment for the audience, aiming to provide a unique experience for the fans attending the benefit concert. However, it seems the performance of this song, or perhaps elements surrounding its inclusion, led to confusion and ultimately, a dispute. While the exact nature of the disagreement during the performance remains somewhat vague, it was significant enough to be cited as a direct cause for the subsequent events. The Who has always been known for its intense live shows, and any deviation or perceived misstep can quickly escalate, especially with a band as experienced and set in their ways as Daltrey and Townshend.Starkey's Perspective and The Band's Response
Zak Starkey recently shared details about his exit, indicating that the confusion during the March performance was a key factor. While he suggested the song, it seems the execution or perhaps a disagreement over its arrangement during the show led to friction. The band's spokesperson confirmed his dismissal following reports of a dispute with the singer, Roger Daltrey. This public revelation from Starkey himself, talking about his "public firing," highlights the breakdown in communication and the intensity of the disagreement. It's clear that the incident at the Royal Albert Hall was not a minor hiccup but a significant event that fractured the long-standing relationship between Starkey and the core members of The Who. After playing those songs with the band for so many decades, Starkey expressed his surprise and sadness at the outcome. This sentiment suggests that he felt his contributions and long service should have afforded him more understanding or a different resolution to the dispute.The First Dismissal and Swift Reinstatement
The recent events surrounding Zak Starkey's departure from The Who are even more perplexing given the rapid succession of his firings and reinstatements. The initial news of his dismissal first emerged in April 2025. Guitarist Pete Townshend announced in an April 19 statement on The Who's website that drummer Zak Starkey, son of Ringo Starr, was no longer with the band. This first announcement was already a shock to many, as Starkey had been a touring member for 29 years, an almost unheard-of tenure for a non-founding member. However, the initial separation was incredibly short-lived. Within weeks, Starkey was reinstated, a move that left many observers scratching their heads. The details surrounding this swift return were not fully disclosed, but it implied that either the initial dispute was quickly resolved, or there was a recognition of Starkey's invaluable contribution to the band's live sound. This back-and-forth suggests a deep ambivalence within The Who's camp regarding Starkey's position, perhaps a struggle between the desire for change and the comfort of a long-standing, reliable partnership. The fact that he was "reinstated into the iconic rock band after being fired in April 2025" only to be let go a second time in May 2025 underscores the volatile nature of the situation. It set the stage for the dramatic "weeks of mayhem" that Starkey later described, indicating that the underlying issues were far from resolved by his brief return.Unraveling the Mayhem: The Second Firing and Underlying Tensions
The second firing of Zak Starkey, announced on May 18, 2025, truly solidified the notion of "weeks of mayhem." This time, the split seems more definitive, with Starkey himself breaking his silence on the firing and expressing his shock and sadness. He stated that he was "shocked and saddened to learn that The Who were firing him after three decades of service." This sentiment suggests a lack of prior warning or a sudden decision that caught him off guard, despite the previous April dismissal.Pete Townshend's Past Comments on Starkey
While the immediate cause of the second firing points to the March Royal Albert Hall incident, there have been subtle hints of underlying tensions over the years. As far back as December 4, 2006, Pete Townshend devoted an entire entry on his website to drummer Zak Starkey, titled "Zak and the Revision of History." In this entry, Townshend discussed the fact that Starkey had played drums for Oasis in 2005, a period that overlapped with his commitment to The Who. This past commentary suggests that Starkey's commitments to other projects, and perhaps his independent spirit, might have occasionally caused friction. Townshend's blog post also indicated that Zak was apparently concerned about an interview Pete did for The Boston Globe that suggested a delay in touring was his fault. This historical context reveals that issues related to scheduling, commitment, and blame have been present in their relationship for well over a decade. The phrase "And when me and Pete catch fire, probably," from the data, though somewhat cryptic, could hint at a long-standing, volatile dynamic between the two musicians. It implies that when disagreements arise, they can be intense and potentially lead to significant consequences.Roger Daltrey's Silence and The Band's Future
While Zak Starkey has been vocal about his side of the story, particularly regarding the March incident and his feelings of being shocked and saddened, Roger Daltrey, The Who's frontman, has remained largely silent on the specifics of the dispute. The band's official statements have been brief, confirming the dismissal and stating, "After many years of great work on drums from Zak the time has come for a change. We move forward now with optimism and fire in our bellies." This measured response from the band, particularly from Daltrey and Townshend, emphasizes a forward-looking perspective rather than dwelling on the past conflict. The lack of detailed explanation from The Who's side leaves much to speculation, but the phrase "time has come for a change" suggests a collective decision to move in a new direction, perhaps indicating that the band felt Starkey's style or approach no longer aligned with their vision, or that the recent disputes had become untenable. The band's advanced age, with Daltrey at 81 and Townshend at 79, might also play a role, as they might seek a less tumultuous environment for their remaining years of touring and recording. The question of "Did Zak Starkey's drumming style change after illness?" also hints at potential factors that could have contributed to the band's decision, though no concrete information is provided on this.Beyond The Who: Zak Starkey's New Chapter
With his tenure as live drummer for The Who apparently brought to a close, Zak Starkey is already looking to the future. He has been actively promoting his new group, Mantra of the Cosmos, which features a collaboration with Noel Gallagher. This new venture provides Starkey with a fresh creative outlet and an opportunity to explore different musical directions. His public discussions about his firing from The Who have often coincided with promoting Mantra of the Cosmos and their new song, indicating a strategic move to pivot from the controversy into his next artistic phase. This isn't the first time Starkey has juggled multiple high-profile projects. His work with Oasis in the mid-2000s demonstrated his ability to contribute significantly to different bands while maintaining a strong individual identity. Mantra of the Cosmos represents a new chapter where Starkey can potentially take on a more central role, shaping the band's sound and direction without the long-standing dynamics and expectations that come with being part of a legacy act like The Who. His energy and talent remain undiminished, and fans will undoubtedly be keen to see how his new musical endeavors unfold.The Who Moves Forward: With Optimism and Fire
Despite the dramatic departure of their long-time drummer, The Who has publicly expressed a resolute determination to move forward. The band's statement, released after the second firing of Zak Starkey, conveyed a clear message: "After many years of great work on drums from Zak the time has come for a change. We move forward now with optimism and fire in our bellies." This declaration, also echoed by Pete Townshend's April 19 statement about "Oxygen, and the band will move forward now with optimism and fire in our," underscores their commitment to their music and their fans, even in the face of significant lineup changes. For a band that has navigated decades of personal and professional challenges, including the deaths of two founding members, The Who has always demonstrated an incredible resilience. Roger Daltrey and Pete Townshend, as the enduring core, are focused on their legacy and continuing to perform their iconic songs. While the absence of Zak Starkey, who was a significant part of their live sound for nearly three decades, will undoubtedly be felt, the band's statement suggests a renewed sense of purpose and energy. The phrase "fire in our bellies" indicates that despite their advanced age, Daltrey and Townshend are far from ready to retire. They are signaling to their audience that The Who will continue to evolve, embrace new challenges, and deliver the powerful performances that have defined their illustrious career. The search for a new drummer will be critical, as they seek someone who can not only honor the band's rich history but also contribute to its future with the same passion and drive. In conclusion, the repeated firing of Zak Starkey from The Who marks a dramatic and surprising chapter in the band's storied history. From the controversial Royal Albert Hall performance to the underlying tensions hinted at over the years, this split signifies more than just a personnel change; it represents the end of a nearly 30-year era. While Zak Starkey embarks on a new journey with Mantra of the Cosmos, The Who, led by the indomitable Daltrey and Townshend, promises to move forward with renewed vigor and "fire in their bellies." This situation underscores the often-complex dynamics within legendary bands, where personal relationships and creative differences can ultimately lead to unforeseen changes. What are your thoughts on this surprising turn of events? Do you think The Who made the right decision, or will Zak Starkey's absence be deeply felt? Share your opinions in the comments below, and don't forget to explore our other articles on rock music legends!
SACFS Promotions Unit History

Progressive Charlestown: A major hidden cost of driving

Zona Safari (Kanto) - Pokémon Central Wiki